Objective Dual-Task Turning Measures for Return-to-Duty Assessment After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The ReTURN Study Protocol.

Autor:	Fino PC; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States., Weightman MM; Courage Kenny Research Center, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, United States., Dibble LE; Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States., Lester ME; Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.; Department of Physical Therapy, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX, United States., Hoppes CW; Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States., Parrington L; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States., Arango J; Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Fort Carson, CO, United States., Souvignier A; Evans Army Community Hospital, Fort Carson, CO, United States., Roberts H; Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, United States., King LA; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Frontiers in neurology [Front Neurol] 2021 Jan 15; Vol. 11, pp. 544812. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 15 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI:	10.3389/fneur.2020.544812
Abstrakt:	Determining readiness for duty after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is essential for the safety of service members and their unit. Currently, these decisions are primarily based on self-reported symptoms, objective measures that assess a single system, or standardized physical or cognitive tests that may be insensitive or lack ecological validity for warrior tasks. While significant technological advancements have been made in a variety of assessments of these individual systems, assessments of isolated tasks are neither diagnostically accurate nor representative of the demands imposed by daily life and military activities. Emerging evidence suggests that complex tasks, such as dual-task paradigms or turning, have utility in probing functional deficits after mTBI. Objective measures from turning tasks in single- or dual-task conditions, therefore, may be highly valuable for clinical assessments and return-to-duty decisions after mTBI. The goals of this study are to assess the diagnostic accuracy, predictive capacity, and responsiveness to rehabilitation of objective, dual-task turning measures within an mTBI population. These goals will be accomplished over two phases. Phase 1 will enroll civilians at three sites and active-duty service members at one site to examine the diagnostic accuracy and predictive capacity of dual-task turning outcomes. Phase 1 participants will complete a series of turning tasks while wearing inertial sensors and a battery of clinical questionnaires, neurocognitive testing, and standard clinical assessments of function. Phase 2 will enroll active-duty service members referred for rehabilitation from two military medical treatment facilities to investigate the responsiveness to rehabilitation of objective dual-task turning measures. Phase 2 participants will complete two assessments of turning while wearing inertial sensors: a baseline assessment prior to the first rehabilitation session and a post-rehabilitation assessment after the physical therapist determines the participant has completed his/her rehabilitation course. A variable selection procedure will then be implemented to determine the best task and outcome measure for return-to-duty decisions based on diagnostic accuracy, predictive capacity, and responsiveness to rehabilitation. Overall, the results of this study will provide guidance and potential new tools for clinical decisions in individuals with mTBI. Clinical Trial Registration : clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier NCT03892291. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2021 Fino, Weightman, Dibble, Lester, Hoppes, Parrington, Arango, Souvignier, Roberts and King.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu