Orthopaedic Application of Cryotherapy: A Comprehensive Review of the History, Basic Science, Methods, and Clinical Effectiveness.
Autor: | Kunkle BF; Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina., Kothandaraman V; Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina., Goodloe JB; Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina., Curry EJ; Department of Orthopaedics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts., Friedman RJ; Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina., Li X; Department of Orthopaedics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts., Eichinger JK; Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | JBJS reviews [JBJS Rev] 2021 Jan 26; Vol. 9 (1), pp. e20.00016. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 26. |
DOI: | 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00016 |
Abstrakt: | »: Cold therapy, also known as cryotherapy, includes the use of bagged ice, ice packs, compressive cryotherapy devices, or whole-body cryotherapy chambers. Cryotherapy is commonly used in postoperative care for both arthroscopic and open orthopaedic procedures. »: Cryotherapy is associated with an analgesic effect caused by microvasculature alterations that decrease the production of inflammatory mediators, decrease local edema, disrupt the overall inflammatory response, and reduce nerve conduction velocity. »: Postoperative cryotherapy using bagged ice, ice packs, or continuous cryotherapy devices reduced visual analog scale pain scores and analgesic consumption in approximately half of research studies in which these outcomes were compared with no cryotherapy (11 [44%] of 25 studies on pain and 11 [48%] of 23 studies on opioids). However, an effect was less frequently reported for increasing range of motion (3 [19%] of 16) or decreasing swelling (2 [22%] of 9). »: Continuous cryotherapy devices demonstrated the best outcome in orthopaedic patients after knee arthroscopy procedures, compared with all other procedures and body locations, in terms of showing a significant reduction in pain, swelling, and analgesic consumption and increase in range of motion, compared with bagged ice or ice packs. »: There is no consensus as to whether the use of continuous cryotherapy devices leads to superior outcomes when compared with treatment with bagged ice or ice packs. However, complications from cryotherapy, including skin irritation, frostbite, perniosis, and peripheral nerve injuries, can be avoided through patient education and reducing the duration of application. »: Future Level-I or II studies are needed to compare both the clinical and cost benefits of continuous cryotherapy devices to bagged ice or ice pack treatment before continuous cryotherapy devices can be recommended as a standard of care in orthopaedic surgery following injury or surgery. Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors indicated that no external funding was received for any aspect of this work. On the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which are provided with the online version of the article, one or more of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author had a relevant financial relationship in the biomedical arena outside the submitted work (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/A654). (Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |