The added value of periodontal measurements for identification of diabetes among Saudi adults.

Autor: Talakey AA; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.; Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia., Hughes F; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK., Almoharib H; Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia., Al-Askar M; Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia., Bernabé E; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of periodontology [J Periodontol] 2021 Jan; Vol. 92 (1), pp. 62-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 10.
DOI: 10.1002/JPER.20-0118
Abstrakt: Background: The aims of this study were to develop a prediction model for identification of individuals with diabetes based on clinical and perceived periodontal measurements; and to evaluate its added value when combined with standard diabetes screening tools.
Methods: The study was carried out among 250 adults attending primary care clinics in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia). The study adopted a case-control approach, where diabetes status was first ascertained, and the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC), Canadian Diabetes Risk questionnaire (CANRISK), and periodontal examinations were carried out afterward.
Results: A periodontal prediction model (PPM) including three periodontal indicators (missing teeth, percentage of sites with pocket probing depth ≥6 mm, and mean pocket probing depth) had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.694 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.612-0.776) and classified correctly 62.4% of participants. The FINDRISC and CANRISK tools had AUCs of 0.766 (95% CI: 0.690-0.843) and 0.821 (95% CI: 0.763-0.879), respectively. The addition of the PPM significantly improved the AUC of FINDRISC (P = 0.048) but not of CANRISK (P = 0.144), with 26.8% and 9.8% of participants correctly reclassified, respectively. Finally, decision curve analysis showed that adding the PPM to both tools would result in net benefits among patients with probability scores lower than 70%.
Conclusions: This study showed that periodontal measurements could play a role in identifying individuals with diabetes, and that addition of clinical periodontal measurements improved the performance of FINDRISC and CANRISK.
(© 2020 American Academy of Periodontology.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: