Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Effectiveness Review.

Autor:	Wilt TJ; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Ullman KE; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Linskens EJ; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., MacDonald R; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Brasure M; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Ester E; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Nelson VA; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Saha J; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Sultan S; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Dahm P; Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The Journal of urology [J Urol] 2021 Apr; Vol. 205 (4), pp. 967-976. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 22.
DOI:	10.1097/JU.0000000000001578
Abstrakt:	Purpose: We sought to identify new information evaluating clinically localized prostate cancer therapies. Materials and Methods: Bibliographic databases (2013-January 2020), ClinicalTrials.gov and systematic reviews were searched for controlled studies of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer with duration ≥5 years for mortality and metastases, and ≥1 year for harms. Results: We identified 67 eligible references. Among patients with clinically, rather than prostate specific antigen, detected localized prostate cancer, watchful waiting may increase mortality and metastases but decreases urinary and erectile dysfunction vs radical prostatectomy. Comparative mortality effect may vary by tumor risk and age but not by race, health status, comorbidities or prostate specific antigen. Active monitoring probably results in little to no mortality difference in prostate specific antigen detected localized prostate cancer vs radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation plus androgen deprivation regardless of tumor risk. Metastases were slightly higher with active monitoring. Harms were greater with radical prostatectomy than active monitoring and mixed between external beam radiation plus androgen deprivation vs active monitoring. 3-Dimensional conformal radiation and androgen deprivation plus low dose rate brachytherapy provided small mortality reductions vs 3-dimensional conformal radiation and androgen deprivation but little to no difference on metastases. External beam radiation plus androgen deprivation vs external beam radiation alone may result in small mortality and metastasis reductions in higher risk disease but may increase sexual harms. Few new data exist on other treatments. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality vs watchful waiting in clinically detected localized prostate cancer but causes more harms. Effectiveness may be limited to younger men and those with intermediate risk disease. Active monitoring results in little to no mortality difference vs radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation plus androgen deprivation. Few new data exist on other treatments.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu