Smoking behaviours and indoor air quality: a comparative analysis of smoking-permitted versus smoke-free homes in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Autor: Ferdous T; Epidemiology research, ARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh tarana@arkfoundationbd.org., Siddiqi K; Institute of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK., Semple S; Institute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling Institute for Social Marketing, Stirling, UK., Fairhurst C; York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK., Dobson R; G10 Pathfoot Building Stirling Campus, University of Stirling Institute for Social Marketing, Stirling, UK., Mdege N; Institute of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK., Marshall AM; Institute of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK., Abdullah SM; Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Dhaka District, Bangladesh.; Health Economics research, ARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh., Huque R; Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Dhaka District, Bangladesh.; Health Economics research, ARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Tobacco control [Tob Control] 2022 May; Vol. 31 (3), pp. 444-451. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 16.
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055969
Abstrakt: Introduction: Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is a health risk to non-smokers. Indoor particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is associated with SHS exposure and is used as a proxy measure. However, PM 2.5 is non-specific and influenced by a number of environmental factors, which are subject to geographical variation. The nature of association between SHS exposure and indoor PM 2.5 -studied primarily in high-income countries (HICs) context-may not be globally applicable. We set out to explore this association in a low/middle-income country setting, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among households with at least one resident smoker. We inquired whether smoking was permitted inside the home (smoking-permitted homes, SPH) or not (smoke-free homes, SFH), and measured indoor PM 2.5 concentrations using a low-cost instrument (Dylos DC1700) for at least 22 hours. We describe and compare SPH and SFH and use multiple linear regression to evaluate which variables are associated with PM 2.5 level among all households.
Results: We surveyed 1746 households between April and August 2018; 967 (55%) were SPH and 779 (45%) were SFH. The difference between PM 2.5 values for SFH (median 27 µg/m 3 , IQR 25) and SPH (median 32 µg/m 3 , IQR 31) was 5 µg/m 3 (p<0.001). Lead participant's education level, being a non-smoker, having outdoor space and smoke-free rule at home and not using kerosene oil for cooking were significantly associated with lower PM 2.5 .
Conclusions: We found a small but significant difference between PM 2.5 concentrations in SPH compared with SFH in Dhaka, Bangladesh-a value much lower than observed in HICs.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: