Autor: |
Stone LE; 14676 Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, USA., Segal DL; 14676 Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, USA. |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
International journal of aging & human development [Int J Aging Hum Dev] 2021 Oct; Vol. 93 (3), pp. 904-926. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 16. |
DOI: |
10.1177/0091415020980762 |
Abstrakt: |
Personality disorders (PDs) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM-5 ) are conceptualized as distinct clinical syndromes. However, debate persists about the clinical utility of this categorical model, with many researchers supporting a dimensional model that focuses on pathological personality traits and personality dysfunction. This model was published in Section III of DSM-5 and named the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). This study evaluated the AMPD by examining relationships between traits and dysfunction with traditional categorical PD constructs among older adults. Older adults ( N = 202) completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 , Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report, and Coolidge Axis II Inventory. Results indicated that pathological personality traits do not relate to categorical PDs in directions predicted by the AMPD. Personality functioning related to categorical PDs in expected theoretical patterns according to the AMPD but lacked incremental validity above pathological personality traits. An implication of these findings is that the AMPD does not fully resolve the age-related issues with the traditional categorical PD model. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|