Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic.

Autor:	Souza KB; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Odontologia, Natal / RN, Brasil., Moura DMD; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Odontologia, Natal / RN, Brasil., Silva SEGD; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Odontologia, Natal / RN, Brasil., Araújo GM; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Odontologia, Natal / RN, Brasil., Pinto RAS; Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Departamento de Odontologia, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil., Leite FPP; Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Departamento de Odontologia, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil., Özcan M; University of Zurich, Division of Dental Biomaterials, Clinic for Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland., Souza ROAE; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Odontologia, Natal / RN, Brasil.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB [J Appl Oral Sci] 2020 Nov 27; Vol. 28, pp. e20200122. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 27 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI:	10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0122
Abstrakt:	Methodology: This paper aims to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on surface topography, wettability, and shear bond strength of resin cement to glass ceramic. For SBS test, 32 blocks (7x7x2 mm) of lithium disilicate were obtained and randomly divided into eight groups (four blocks per group) according to each surface treatment (HF 20 s, 60 s, 120 s + silanization/S or Scotch Bond Universal/ SBU) and the Monobond Etch & Prime - MEP application followed or not by SBU. On each treated surface ceramic block, up to four dual-curing resin cement cylinders were prepared and light-cured for 40s (N=120/n=15). The specimens were thermocycled (10,000 cycles, 5-55°C, 30 s) and the SBS test (50KgF, 0.5 mm/min) was performed. Furthermore, failure analysis, wettability, AFM, and SEM were carried out. SBS data (MPa) were analyzed using Student's t-test, two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test (5%) and Weibull's analysis. Results: For HF experimental groups, two-way ANOVA presented the factors "etching time" and "bonding agent" as significant (p<0.05). After silane application, the HF groups presented similar bond strength. SBU application compromised the SBS, except for 120s etching time (HF120sS: 23.39ᵃ±6.48 MPa; HF120sSBU: 18.76ᵃ±8.81MPa). For MEP groups, SBU application did not significantly affect the results (p=0.41). The MEP group presented the highest Weibull modulus (4.08A) and they were statistically different exclusively from the HF20sSBU (0.58B). Conclusion: The HF 20s, 60s, 120 s followed by silane, promoted similar resin-bond strength to ceramic and the SBU application after HF or MEP did not increase the SBS.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu