| Autor: |
Caldwell HA; Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.; Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada., Di Cristofaro NA; Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada., Cairney J; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia., Bray SR; Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada., Timmons BW; Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.; Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme [Appl Physiol Nutr Metab] 2021 Jun; Vol. 46 (6), pp. 571-578. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 01. |
| DOI: |
10.1139/apnm-2020-0648 |
| Abstrakt: |
The Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth (PLAY) Tools are a suite of tools to assess an individual's physical literacy. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the PLAY Tools, including inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, validity and the associations between the tools. In this study, 218 children and youth (aged 8.4 to 13.7 years) and a parent/guardian completed the appropriate physical literacy assessments (i.e., PLAYbasic, PLAYfun, PLAYparent and PLAYself) and the Bruiniks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2). Inter-rater reliability for PLAYfun was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94). The PLAYbasic, PLAYfun total, running and object control scores, and PLAYparent motor competence domain were higher in males than females, and PLAYfun locomotor skills were lower in males than females ( p < 0.05). Age was positively correlated with PLAYbasic and PLAYfun ( r = 0.14-0.32, p < 0.05). BOT-2 was positively correlated with PLAYfun and PLAYbasic ( r = 0.19-0.59, p < 0.05). PLAYbasic is a significant predictor of PLAYfun ( r 2 = 0.742, p < 0.001). PLAYfun, PLAYparent and PLAYself were moderately correlated with one another. PLAYfun, PLAYparent and PLAYself demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.74-0.87, ω = 0.73-0.87). The PLAY Tools demonstrated moderate associations between one another, strong inter-rater reliability and good construct and convergent validity. Continued evaluation of these tools with other populations, such as adolescents, is necessary. Novelty: In school-age children, the PLAY Tools demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability, moderate associations with one another, acceptable internal consistency and good construct and convergent validity. The results suggest that that PLAY Tools are an acceptable method of evaluation for physical literacy in school-age children. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
