Influence of single post, oval, and multi-post restorative techniques and amount of residual tooth substance on fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

Autor:	Spicciarelli V; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena., Marruganti C; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena., Di Matteo C; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena., Martignoni M; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena., Ounsi H; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena., Doldo T; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Orthodontics, University of Siena., Ferrari M; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Prosthodontics, University of Siena., Grandini S; Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of oral science [J Oral Sci] 2020 Dec 23; Vol. 63 (1), pp. 70-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 25.
DOI:	10.2334/josnusd.20-0338
Abstrakt:	Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the influence of the number of coronal walls and post-endodontic restorations on the mechanical strength of 165 recently extracted endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Methods: The teeth were divided into 3 control (no post) and 3 test groups according to the number of residual walls. Each test group was divided into subgroups according to the type of post-endodontic restoration (single, oval, and multi-post techniques). Samples were prepared conforming to the assigned subgroup. A universal loading machine applied a load parallel to the longitudinal axis of the teeth, thus simulating physiological occlusion. ANOVA and the Kruskal Wallis test were used for comparisons (P ≤ 0.05), and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. Results: For intact teeth, significant differences were found among all 3 subgroups, with single post showing the highest values. For 3 residual walls, oval post resulted in significantly lower values than single and multi-post systems. For 2 residual walls, the multi-post technique showed almost twice the resistance of oval post restorations. Conclusion: In oval canals the use of a single or multi-post technique increased post-and-core resistance even in intact teeth, whereas oval fiber posts showed no improvements. Multi-post design improved fracture resistance mostly in maxillary premolars lacking both marginal ridges.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu