Identifying factors that conjointly influence nicotine vaping product relative harm perception among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Autor: Yong HH; Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: hua.yong@deakin.edu.au., Karmakar C; Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia., Motin MA; RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia., Borland R; University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Elton-Marshall T; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Western University, Ontario, Canada; Lakehead University, Ontario, Canada., Cummings KM; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Fong GT; University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada., Thompson ME; University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Drug and alcohol dependence [Drug Alcohol Depend] 2021 Jan 01; Vol. 218, pp. 108370. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108370
Abstrakt: Background: Use of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) to replace smoking is often influenced by perceived harmfulness of these products relative to smoking. This study aimed to identify factors that conjointly influenced NVP relative harm perception among smokers and ex-smokers.
Methods: Data (n = 11,838) from adult smokers and ex-smokers (quit < 2 years) who participated in the 2016 ITC 4 Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys in Australia, Canada, England and the US were analyzed. Decision tree models were used to classify respondents into those who perceived vaping as less harmful than smoking ("correct" perception) versus otherwise ("incorrect" perception) based on their socio-demographic, smoking and vaping related variables.
Results: Decision tree analysis identified nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) harmfulness perceptions relative to smoking, perceived vaping portrayal in the media and other sources as positive, negative or balanced, recency of seeking online vaping information, and age as the key variables that interacted conjointly to classify respondents into those with "correct" versus "incorrect" harm perceptions of vaping relative to smoking (model performance accuracy = 0.70-0.74). In all countries, NRT relative harmfulness perception and vaping portrayal perception were consistently the two most important classifying variables, with other variables showing some country differences.
Conclusions: In all four countries, perception of NVP relative harmfulness among smokers and recent ex-smokers is strongly influenced by a combination of NRT relative harmfulness perception and vaping portrayal in the media and other sources. These conjoint factors can serve as useful markers for identifying subgroups more vulnerable to misperception about NVP relative harmfulness to benefit from corrective intervention.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: