Autor: |
Yang Y; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China., Yang D; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China., Zhang Q; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China., Guo X; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China., Raymond JL; Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdomyanye.yang@smail.nju.edu.cn, dz1622044@smail.nju.edu.cn, qizhang@smail.nju.edu.cn, guoxs@nju.edu.cn, jason.raymond@eng.ox.ac.uk, ronald.roy@eng.ox.ac.uk, dzhang@nju.edu.cn, juantu@nju.edu.cn., Roy RA; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China., Zhang D; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China., Tu J; Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics (MOE), Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China. |
Abstrakt: |
Acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) is an important process that enables the theragnostic application of acoustically activated droplets, where the nucleation of inertial cavitation (IC) activity must be precisely controlled. This Letter describes threshold pressure measurements for ADV and acoustic emissions consistent with IC activity of lipid-shelled non-superheated perfluoropentane nanodroplets over a range of physiologically relevant concentrations at 1.1-MHz. Under the frequency investigated, results show that the thresholds were relatively independent of concentration for intermediate concentrations (10 5 , 10 6 , and 10 7 droplets/ml), thus indicating an optimal range of droplet concentrations for conducting threshold studies. For the highest concentration, the difference between the threshold for IC and the threshold for ADV was greatly reduced, suggesting that it might prove difficult to induce ADV without concomitant IC in applications that employ higher concentrations. |