| Autor: |
Tournier A; Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Water Research Lab, Heidelberg, Germany., Würtenberger S; Scientific & Regulatory Affairs, Hevert-Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG, Nussbaum, Germany., Klein SD; Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland., Baumgartner S; Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Society for Cancer Research, Arlesheim, Switzerland.; Institute of Integrative Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) [J Altern Complement Med] 2021 Jan; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 45-57. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 28. |
| DOI: |
10.1089/acm.2020.0243 |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives: In parts I and II of our review of physicochemical research performed on homeopathic preparations, we identified relevant publications and analyzed the data in terms of individual experiments, looking for the most promising techniques that were used in the past. In this third part, we analyze the results of the experiments seeking to extract information about the possible modes of action underpinning homeopathic preparations. Methods: We summarized the results from the 11 experimental areas previously introduced, extracting the general findings and trends. We also summarized the results in terms of specific research topics: aging, medium used for potentization, sample volume, temperature, material of potentization vessel, and, finally, the use of molecules to probe homeopathic samples. Results: We identified a number of effects that appear consistently throughout the data: Differences to controls seem to increase with: time, moderate temperature, small samples volume, and in ionic medium, whereas high temperatures seem to abolish differences to controls. Based on the present analysis, there is no consistent evidence to date for the nanoparticle hypothesis to explain specific homeopathic treatment effects. However, the quantum coherence domain hypothesis, the dynamic water cluster hypothesis, and the weak quantum theory are still contenders and need to be further assessed experimentally. Conclusions: The field requires further targeted experimentation to validate past findings reporting differences between homeopathic dilutions and controls, and to expand these findings by specifically testing the three main working hypotheses that are currently at hand. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
