Recommendations From the Twitter Hashtag #DoctorsAreDickheads: Qualitative Analysis.

Autor: Sharma AE; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States., Mann Z; Ziva Mann Consulting, Newton, MA, United States., Cherian R; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Department of Culture and Theory, School of Humanities, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States., Del Rosario JB; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Berkeley School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States., Yang J; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States., Sarkar U; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of medical Internet research [J Med Internet Res] 2020 Oct 28; Vol. 22 (10), pp. e17595. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 28.
DOI: 10.2196/17595
Abstrakt: Background: The social media site Twitter has 145 million daily active users worldwide and has become a popular forum for users to communicate their health care concerns and experiences as patients. In the fall of 2018, a hashtag titled #DoctorsAreDickheads emerged, with almost 40,000 posts calling attention to health care experiences.
Objective: This study aims to identify common health care conditions and conceptual themes represented within the phenomenon of this viral Twitter hashtag.
Methods: We analyzed a random sample of 5.67% (500/8818) available tweets for qualitative analysis between October 15 and December 31, 2018, when the hashtag was the most active. Team coders reviewed the same 20.0% (100/500) tweets and the remainder individually. We abstracted the user's health care role and clinical conditions from the tweet and user profile, and used phenomenological content analysis to identify prevalent conceptual themes through sequential open coding, memoing, and discussion of concepts until an agreement was reached.
Results: Our final sample comprised 491 tweets and unique Twitter users. Of this sample, 50.5% (248/491) were from patients or patient advocates, 9.6% (47/491) from health care professionals, 4.3% (21/491) from caregivers, 3.7% (18/491) from academics or researchers, 1.0% (5/491) from journalists or media, and 31.6% (155/491) from non-health care individuals or other. The most commonly mentioned clinical conditions were chronic pain, mental health, and musculoskeletal conditions (mainly Ehlers-Danlos syndrome). We identified 3 major themes: disbelief in patients' experience and knowledge that contributes to medical errors and harm, the power inequity between patients and providers, and metacommentary on the meaning and impact of the #DoctorsAreDickheads hashtag.
Conclusions: People publicly disclose personal and often troubling health care experiences on Twitter. This adds new accountability for the patient-provider interaction, highlights how harmful communication affects diagnostic safety, and shapes the public's viewpoint of how clinicians behave. Hashtags such as this offer valuable opportunities to learn from patient experiences. Recommendations include developing best practices for providers to improve communication, supporting patients through challenging diagnoses, and promoting patient engagement.
(©Anjana Estelle Sharma, Ziva Mann, Roy Cherian, Jan Bing Del Rosario, Janine Yang, Urmimala Sarkar. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.10.2020.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje