Development of a tool for identifying and addressing prioritised determinants of quality improvement initiatives led by healthcare professionals: a mixed-methods study.

Autor:	van Tuijl AAC; Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Wollersheim HC; Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Fluit CRMG; Department for Research in Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Gerard van Swietenlaan 2, 6525 GB Nijmegen, the Netherlands., van Gurp PJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Calsbeek H; Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Implementation science communications [Implement Sci Commun] 2020 Oct 23; Vol. 1, pp. 92. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 23 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI:	10.1186/s43058-020-00082-w
Abstrakt:	Background: Several frameworks have been developed to identify essential determinants for healthcare improvement. These frameworks aim to be comprehensive, leading to the creation of long lists of determinants that are not prioritised based on being experienced as most important. Furthermore, most existing frameworks do not describe the methods or actions used to identify and address the determinants, limiting their practical value. The aim of this study is to describe the development of a tool with prioritised facilitators and barriers supplemented with methods to identify and address each determinant. The tool can be used by those performing quality improvement initiatives in healthcare practice. Methods: A mixed-methods study design was used to develop the tool. First, an online survey was used to ask healthcare professionals about the determinants they experienced as most facilitating and most hindering during the performance of their quality improvement initiative. A priority score was calculated for every named determinant, and those with a priority score ≥ 20 were incorporated into the tool. Semi-structured interviews with implementation experts were performed to gain insight on how to analyse and address the determinants in our tool. Results: The 25 healthcare professionals in this study experienced 64 facilitators and 66 barriers when performing their improvement initiatives. Of these, 12 facilitators and nine barriers were incorporated into the tool. Sufficient support from management of the department was identified as the most important facilitator, while having limited time to perform the initiative was considered the most important barrier. The interviews with 16 experts in implementation science led to various inputs for identifying and addressing each determinant. Important themes included maintaining adequate communication with stakeholders, keeping the initiative at a manageable size, learning by doing and being able to influence determinants. Conclusions: This paper describes the development of a tool with prioritised determinants for performing quality improvement initiatives with suggestions for analysing and addressing these determinants. The tool is developed for those engaged in quality improvement initiatives in practice, so in this way it helps in bridging the research to practice gap of determinants frameworks. More research is needed to validate and develop the tool further. Competing Interests: Competing interestsHW, HC and PG have roles in the master’s programme on which the participants for this study are employed; HW was the former director of the master’s, HC is co-ordinator of the programme and PG is current director of the master’s. The master’s programme is partly financed by the Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers, which is the same organisation that financed this study. To ensure confidentiality of participants, identifying data about the individuals were only available to the main researcher AvT, who has no role in the master’s programme nor any association with the Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers. (© The Author(s) 2020.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: