[Informative value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma].
Autor: | Druzhinin DS; Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia.; Society of Specialists for Neuromuscular Diseases, Moscow, Russia., Druzhinina ES; Society of Specialists for Neuromuscular Diseases, Moscow, Russia., Novikov ML; Motus Medicine LLC, Yaroslavl, Russia., Torno TE; Motus Medicine LLC, Yaroslavl, Russia., Karapetyan AS; Motus Medicine LLC, Yaroslavl, Russia., Nikitin SS; Society of Specialists for Neuromuscular Diseases, Moscow, Russia. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | ruština |
Zdroj: | Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko [Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko] 2020; Vol. 84 (5), pp. 72-80. |
DOI: | 10.17116/neiro20208405172 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: To describe clinical and sonographic features of confirmed intraneural perineurioma in 5 patients. Material and Methods: We report clinical and sonographic features and retrospective follow-up data in 5 patients with intraneural perineurioma verified by biopsy. Results: In all cases, symptoms were represented by a slowly progressive painless mononeuropathy with muscle atrophy and impaired tendon reflexes. Ultrasound examination revealed locally enlarged cross-sectional area of the nerve that was confirmed by intraoperative visualization. Conclusion: Intraneural perineurioma should be obligatory suspected in case of fusiform thickening of the nerve with locally changed echogenicity. Pooled multiple-center studies with large samples are needed to determine sensitivity and specificity of the main ultrasound parameters including changes in cross-sectional area and echogenicity of the nerve. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |