Resistance training and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews.

Autor: El-Kotob R; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.; KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada., Ponzano M; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada., Chaput JP; Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada., Janssen I; School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada., Kho ME; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada., Poitras VJ; Independent Researcher, Kanata, ON K2K 0E5, Canada., Ross R; School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada., Ross-White A; Queen's University Library, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada., Saunders TJ; Department of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada., Giangregorio LM; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.; Schlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, ON N2J 0E2, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme [Appl Physiol Nutr Metab] 2020 Oct; Vol. 45 (10 (Suppl. 2)), pp. S165-S179.
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0245
Abstrakt: The objective of this overview of systematic reviews was to determine the benefits and harms of resistance training (RT) on health outcomes in adults aged 18 years or older, compared with not participating in RT. Four electronic databases were searched in February 2019 for systematic reviews published in the past 10 years. Eligibility criteria were determined a priori for population (community dwelling adults), intervention (exclusively RT), comparator (no RT or different doses of RT), and health outcomes (critical: mortality, physical functioning, health-related quality of life, and adverse events; important: cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, mental health, brain health, cognitive function, cancer, fall-related injuries or falls, and bone health). We selected 1 review per outcome and we used the GRADE process to assess the strength of evidence. We screened 2089 records and 375 full-text articles independently, in duplicate. Eleven systematic reviews were included, representing 364 primary studies and 382 627 unique participants. RT was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence, and an improvement in physical functioning. Effects on health-related quality of life or cognitive function were less certain. Adverse events were not consistently monitored or reported in RT studies, but serious adverse events were not common. Systematic reviews for the remaining important health outcomes could not be identified. Overall, RT training improved health outcomes in adults and the benefits outweighed the harms. (PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42019121641.) Novelty This overview was required to inform whether there was new evidence to support changes to the recommended guidelines for resistance training.
Databáze: MEDLINE