| Autor: |
Montoro M; Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain., Arrua-Duarte E; Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.; Mentalia Salud-Arévalo (Ávila), Spain., Peñalver-Argüeso B; Unidad Docente de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Escuela Nacional de Sanidad - Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain., Migoya-Borja M; University Hospital Jimenez Diaz Foundation, Madrid, Spain., Baca-Garcia E; Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.; University Hospital Jimenez Diaz Foundation, Madrid, Spain.; Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Móstoles, Spain.; General Hospital of Villalba, Madrid, Spain.; Infanta Elena University Hospital, Valdemoro, Spain.; Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.; Department of Adult Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, France., Barrigón ML; Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.; University Hospital Jimenez Diaz Foundation, Madrid, Spain. |
| Abstrakt: |
The gold standard for measuring anhedonia is the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). To date, there are no validated electronic versions of this questionnaire. We aim to study the equivalence between the traditional paper-and-pencil format and a digital version of the SHAPS. A group of 67 patients completed both SHAPS formats, and differences between formats were assessed. McNemar's test showed no significant differences between the two systems. The Kappa coefficient was over 40% for most items, and reliability was above 0.8, showing good to excellent levels of internal consistency. Thus, we have demonstrated a close equivalence between paper-and-pencil and electronic SHAPS. |
