| Autor: |
Fukumitsu M; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Westerhof BE; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands., Ruigrok D; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Braams NJ; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Groeneveldt JA; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Bayoumy AA; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Internal Medicine, Chest Unit, Suez Canal University Hospitals, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt., Marcus JT; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Meijboom LJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., de Man FS; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Westerhof N; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Bogaard HJ; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Vonk Noordegraaf A; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
| Abstrakt: |
Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and compliance are comparable in proximal and distal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, proximal CTEPH is associated with inferior right ventricular (RV) adaptation. Early wave reflection in proximal CTEPH may be responsible for altered RV function. The aims of the study are as follows: 1 ) to investigate whether reflected pressure returns sooner in proximal than in distal CTEPH and 2 ) to elucidate whether the timing of reflected pressure is related to RV dimensions, ejection fraction (RVEF), hypertrophy, and wall stress. Right heart catheterization and cardiac MRI were performed in 17 patients with proximal CTEPH and 17 patients with distal CTEPH. In addition to the determination of PVR, compliance, and characteristic impedance, wave separation analysis was performed to determine the magnitude and timing of the peak reflected pressure (as %systole). Findings were related to RV dimensions and time-resolved RV wall stress. Proximal CTEPH was characterized by higher RV volumes, mass, and wall stress, and lower RVEF. While PVR, compliance, and characteristic impedance were similar, proximal CTEPH was related to an earlier return of reflected pressure than distal CTEPH (proximal 53 ± 8% vs. distal 63 ± 15%, P < 0.05). The magnitude of the reflected pressure waves did not differ. RV volumes, RVEF, RV mass, and wall stress were all related to the timing of peak reflected pressure. Poor RV function in patients with proximal CTEPH is related to an early return of reflected pressure wave. PVR, compliance, and characteristic impedance do not explain the differences in RV function between proximal and distal CTEPH. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), proximal localization of vessel obstructions is associated with poor right ventricular (RV) function compared with distal localization, though pulmonary vascular resistance, vascular compliance, characteristic impedance, and the magnitude of wave reflection are similar. In proximal CTEPH, the RV is exposed to an earlier return of the reflected wave. Early wave reflection may increase RV wall stress and compromise RV function. |
