Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species.

Autor: Leal CG; Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. c.gontijoleal@gmail.com celtlen@gmail.com.; Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, CEP 37200-900, Lavras, MG, Brazil., Lennox GD; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. c.gontijoleal@gmail.com celtlen@gmail.com., Ferraz SFB; Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil., Ferreira J; EMBRAPA Amazônia Oriental, CEP 66095-100, Belém, Pará, Brazil., Gardner TA; Stockholm Environment Institute, Linegatan 87D, 11523, Stockholm Sweden., Thomson JR; Department of Environment, Land, Water, and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia., Berenguer E; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.; Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Lees AC; Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK.; Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA., Hughes RM; Amnis Opes Institute, Corvallis, OR, USA.; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA., Mac Nally R; School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia., Aragão LEOC; Tropical Ecosystems and Environmental Sciences Group (TREES), Remote Sensing Division, National Institute for Space Research-INPE, Avenida dos Astronautas, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.; College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK., de Brito JG; Escola Estadual Maria Miranda Araújo, Secretaria de Educação do Estado de Mato Grosso, Av. Aeroporto, s/n, CEP 78336-000, Colniza, MT, Brazil., Castello L; Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA., Garrett RD; Environmental Policy Lab, Departments of Environmental System Science and Humanities, Social, and Political Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland., Hamada N; Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araújo, 2.936, Petrópolis, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, AM, Brazil., Juen L; Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Correia, No. 1, Bairro Guamá, CEP 66075-110, Belém, PA, Brazil., Leitão RP; Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627, CP 486, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil., Louzada J; Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, CEP 37200-900, Lavras, MG, Brazil., Morello TF; Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil., Moura NG; Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, PA, Brazil., Nessimian JL; Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho 373, CEP 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil., Oliveira-Junior JMB; Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia das Águas, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Rua Vera Paz, s/n (Unidade Tapajós), Bairro Salé, CEP 68040-255, Santarém, PA, Brazil., Oliveira VHF; Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, CEP 37200-900, Lavras, MG, Brazil., de Oliveira VC; Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araújo, 2.936, Petrópolis, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, AM, Brazil., Parry L; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK., Pompeu PS; Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, CEP 37200-900, Lavras, MG, Brazil., Solar RRC; Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627, CP 486, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil., Zuanon J; Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araújo, 2.936, Petrópolis, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, AM, Brazil., Barlow J; Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, CEP 37200-900, Lavras, MG, Brazil.; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Science (New York, N.Y.) [Science] 2020 Oct 02; Vol. 370 (6512), pp. 117-121.
DOI: 10.1126/science.aba7580
Abstrakt: Conservation initiatives overwhelmingly focus on terrestrial biodiversity, and little is known about the freshwater cobenefits of terrestrial conservation actions. We sampled more than 1500 terrestrial and freshwater species in the Amazon and simulated conservation for species from both realms. Prioritizations based on terrestrial species yielded on average just 22% of the freshwater benefits achieved through freshwater-focused conservation. However, by using integrated cross-realm planning, freshwater benefits could be increased by up to 600% for a 1% reduction in terrestrial benefits. Where freshwater biodiversity data are unavailable but aquatic connectivity is accounted for, freshwater benefits could still be doubled for negligible losses of terrestrial coverage. Conservation actions are urgently needed to improve the status of freshwater species globally. Our results suggest that such gains can be achieved without compromising terrestrial conservation goals.
(Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.)
Databáze: MEDLINE