Clinical guideline and treatment planning decisions of single-tooth implants versus preserving natural teeth with nonsurgical endodontic therapy.

Autor: Bhattacharyya S; Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Haldia Institute of Dental Science and Research, West Bengal, India., Das DP; Professor & HOD, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Haldia Institute of Dental Science and Research, West Bengal, India., Bhattacharyya A; Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Haldia Institute of Dental Science and Research, West Bengal, India., Maity AB; Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Haldia Institute of Dental Science and Research, West Bengal, India., Das D; Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Haldia Institute of Dental Science and Research, West Bengal, India.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of family medicine and primary care [J Family Med Prim Care] 2020 Jun 30; Vol. 9 (6), pp. 2654-2658. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 30 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_128_20
Abstrakt: The outcomes of both dental implants and endodontically treated teeth have been extensively studied. An assessment of whether to rehabilitate a tooth requiring endodontic treatment or to replace it with a dental implant can often involve a challenging and complex decision making process for clinicians now a days. This review describes practical criteria and a systematic process to aid the treatment planning decision of whether to preserve teeth by root canal treatment (RCT) or extract and provide an implant. This article reviews the benefits and disadvantages of both treatment options and discusses success vs. survival outcomes.
Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje