[Prevention and control of antimicrobial stewardship: a review of evidenceGestión de las intervenciones en materia de prevención y control de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos en los hospitales: revisión de la evidencia].

Autor:	de Melo RC; Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil., de Araújo BC; Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil., de Bortoli MC; Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil., Toma TS; Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS São Paulo (SP) Brasil Secretaria de Estado de Saúde, Instituto de Saúde, Centro de Tecnologias de Saúde para o SUS, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Jazyk:	portugalština
Zdroj:	Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health [Rev Panam Salud Publica] 2020 Sep 23; Vol. 44, pp. e35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 23 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI:	10.26633/RPSP.2020.35
Abstrakt:	Objective: To identify effective interventions to manage antimicrobial resistance in hospital settings and potential barriers to their implementation. Method: A synthesis of evidence for health policy was performed using SUPPORT tools. Literature searches were performed in November and December 2018 in 14 databases. A face-to-face deliberative dialogue workshop to identify implementation barriers was performed with 23 participants (manager, researchers, and health care professionals) and 14 listeners divided into three groups. Researchers with experience in deliberative dialogue acted as facilitators. Results: Twenty-seven systematic reviews focusing on antimicrobial stewardship using combined or individual strategies were identified. The interventions included education, electronic systems, use of biomarkers, and several strategies of antimicrobial management. The main barriers to the implementation of interventions, identified in the literature and deliberative dialogue workshop, were poor infrastructure and insufficient human resources, patient complaints regarding the treatment received, cultural differences within the multidisciplinary team, work overload, and lack of financing/planning. Conclusion: Most of the strategies identified were effective for antimicrobial stewardship in hospital settings. The reliability of results may be strengthened with the performance of additional research of higher methodological quality.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu