Use of the color Doppler twinkle artifact for teaching ultrasound guided peripheral vascular access.

Autor: Gardecki J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Hughes LP; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Zakaria S; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Lewiss RE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Goodsell K; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Risler Z; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Chang AM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Shughart H; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Norton K; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Au A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The journal of vascular access [J Vasc Access] 2021 Sep; Vol. 22 (5), pp. 692-696. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 22.
DOI: 10.1177/1129729820959907
Abstrakt: Background: The optimal method for teaching ultrasound guided peripheral IV (USGPIV) insertion is unknown. Poor needle tip visualization has been cited for USGPIV failure. Twinkle artifact (TA), visualized with color Doppler, is used in other clinical settings. Our objective was to investigate whether teaching students USGPIV placement utilizing TA would enhance needle tip visualization and improve first pass success.
Methods: This was a prospective, randomized study of premedical and preclinical medical students without prior USGPIV experience. Students were given a standardized didactic session on USGPIV placement before being randomized and separated to learn and practice USGPIV with or without TA (control). The students were given 5 min to perform USGPIV on phantom models. The primary outcome was the rate of first pass success. Secondary outcomes included total time to cannulation, rate of posterior venous wall puncture, and total number of attempts.
Results: Rates of first pass success were similar in both the TA (82%) and control groups (57%), p  = 0.095. There was a difference in the mean time to cannulation. The TA group achieved success at 50.76 s (SD 26.93) while the control group achieved success at 85.30 s (SD 65.47), p  = 0.048.
Conclusion: In this study of utilizing TA to aid in USGPIV placement, students were able to achieve successful cannulation in a shorter amount of time. There was no significant difference in first pass success. Future studies should utilize a larger sample size and evaluate the utility of TA when placing USGPIV on patients.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: