| Autor: |
Jones JRA; Physiotherapy Department (Ms Jones and Dr Berney) and Melbourne School of Health Sciences (Dr Denehy), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Division of Allied Health, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia (Ms Jones, Mr McDonald, and Dr Berney); Institute of Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia (Ms Jones); William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England (Dr Puthucheary); Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, England (Dr Puthucheary); and Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Dr Denehy)., Puthucheary Z, McDonald LA, Denehy L, Berney S |
| Abstrakt: |
Survivors of critical illness can experience persistent deficits in physical function and poor health-related quality of life and utilize significant health care resources. Short-term improvements in these outcomes have been reported following physical rehabilitation. Safety and feasibility of delivering physical rehabilitation are established; however, low physical activity levels are observed throughout the recovery of patients. We provide examples on how physical activity may be increased through interdisciplinary models of service delivery. Recently, however, there has been an emergence of large randomized controlled trials reporting no effect on long-term patient outcomes. In this review, we use a proposed theoretical construct to unpack the findings of 12 randomized controlled trials that delivered physical rehabilitation during the acute hospital stay. We describe the search for the responder according to modifiers of treatment effect for physical function, health-related quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes. In addition, we propose tailoring and timing physical rehabilitation interventions to patient subgroups that may respond differently based on their impairments and perpetuating factors that hinder recovery. We examine in detail the timing, components, and dosage of the trial intervention arms. We also describe facilitators and barriers to physical rehabilitation implementation and factors that are influential in recovery from critical illness. Through this theoretical construct, we anticipate that physical rehabilitation programs can be better tailored to the needs of survivors to deliver appropriate interventions to patients who derive greatest benefit optimally timed in their recovery trajectory. |
