The Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients With AML Treated With a Hypomethylating Agent.

Autor: Ozga M; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Huang Y; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Blachly JS; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Grieselhuber NR; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Wall S; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Larkin K; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Haque T; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Walker AR; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Bhatnagar B; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Behbehani G; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Vasu S; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Maakaron JE; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN., Lustberg M; Division of Infectious Disease, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH., Mims AS; Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: alice.mims@osumc.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia [Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk] 2021 Jan; Vol. 21 (1), pp. e76-e83. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.08.013
Abstrakt: Background: Newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive induction with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) are often neutropenic with an increased risk for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). This study analyzed the incidence and risk factors for IFIs in these patients, evaluated clinical patterns in antifungal prophylaxis, and assessed the diagnostic utility of tests in this setting.
Patients and Methods: We studied 117 newly diagnosed patients with AML treated with HMAs at our center, divided into groups based on concern for IFI (cIFI: all possible, probable, and proven IFIs) versus no concern for IFI. The Fisher exact test compared patients with cIFI versus without, and a multivariable logistic regression model estimated odds for cIFI.
Results: Sixty-seven (57%) patients had cIFI, with 48 possible IFIs, 17 probable, and 2 proven cases. There was no difference in incidence based on home zip code, but the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was highly associated with cIFI (P = .001), as was male gender (P = .01). Neutropenia at treatment initiation was borderline in significance (P = .08). In diagnostics, 9% of patients had positive serum fungal markers, and 30 patients underwent bronchoscopy, with only 27% of cases yielding positive results. There was a difference in treatment regimens between patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with mold coverage versus without mold coverage with respect to cIFI (P = .04).
Conclusions: cIFI in patients with AML treated with HMAs remains significant, especially in males and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who were found to be at higher risk. This may prompt clinicians to consider anti-mold prophylaxis in this setting.
(Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE