Infrared thermography reveals surface body temperature changes during proestrus and estrus reproductive phases in Gyr heifers (Bos taurus indicus).

Autor: Vicentini RR; Centro Avançado de Pesquisa de Bovinos de Corte, Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: rog.vicentini@hotmail.com., Montanholi YR; Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States., Veroneze R; Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil., Oliveira AP; Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., Lima MLP; Centro Avançado de Pesquisa de Bovinos de Corte, Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil., Ujita A; Centro Avançado de Pesquisa de Bovinos de Corte, Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil., El Faro L; Centro Avançado de Pesquisa de Bovinos de Corte, Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: lenira.zadra@sp.gov.br.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of thermal biology [J Therm Biol] 2020 Aug; Vol. 92, pp. 102662. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 03.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102662
Abstrakt: Our aim was to evaluate the application of infrared thermography (IRT) to detect body surface temperature variation of body regions during the proestrus and estrus phases of the reproductive cycle of Gyr heifers and investigate environmental factors that could affect these measurements. Fifty-seven heifers were submitted to an ovulation synchronization protocol. This was followed by monitoring the heifers every 12 h over 60 h. Heifers were monitored for rectal and vaginal temperature using a digital thermometer. The surface temperature of the eye, vulva, and muzzle regions were monitored by IRT. Meteorological data was recorded for temperature and humidity. Observation of sexual behavior was performed to monitor estrus onset. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to identify the dominant follicle and confirm ovulation of all heifers. We observed a decrease in temperature of the rectum and vagina, as well as in the eye and vulva regions within the first 12 h after the completion of the synchronization. This period coincides with the expected proestrus phase of the estrous cycle. A progressive increase in all temperatures was noticed in the following 36 h, which coincides with the estrus phase of the reproductive cycle. The regions evaluated around the vulva and eye exhibited the highest temperature and experienced less environmental distortion than the muzzle area thermographs. Environmental factors, such as rainfall and temperature-humidity index, influenced the IRT readings altering the radiation patterns detected. In conclusion, IRT is an effective method to detect temperature variation during the proestrus and estrus phases in Gyr heifers. Furthermore, biological and environmental effects should be considered when collecting and interpreting IRT data in livestock.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE