Teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient and physician experiences.
| Autor: | Melian C; Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, USA., Kieser D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, New Zealand., Frampton C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, New Zealand., C Wyatt M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, New Zealand. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of telemedicine and telecare [J Telemed Telecare] 2022 Aug; Vol. 28 (7), pp. 471-480. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 01. |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1357633X20950995 |
| Abstrakt: | Introduction: The primary purpose of this review was to evaluate patient and physician preference and satisfaction for teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery compared to traditional face-to-face consultation. In addition, we evaluated the effects of teleconsultation on patient length of visit, healthcare costs, range of motion (ROM), pain, quality of life (QOL), and ongoing management plans. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomised control trials and case control studies comparing teleconsultation with traditional, face-to-face consultation in the management of orthopaedic conditions were included. The primary outcome measures were patient and physician preference and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient length of visit, healthcare costs, ROM, pain, QOL, and ongoing management plans. Results: A total of 13 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included for systematic review and 8 for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, length of visit, or time spent with the physician between the telemedicine and in-office control group. The mean difference of patient preference for telemedicine was significantly higher in the telemedicine group compared to the in-office visit group (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.87, p = 0.005). Discussion: Telemedicine was not inferior to face-to-face office visits in regard to patient and physician preference and satisfaction. Therefore, it would be an effective adjunct to face-to-face office visits, serving as a mechanism of triage and long-term continuity of care. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|