Patterns of food parenting practices regarding junk food and sugary drinks among parent-child dyads.

Autor: Thomson JL; US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 141 Experiment Station Road, PO Box 225, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA. jessica.thomson@usda.gov., Hennessy E; Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA., Landry AS; Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Central Arkansas, McAllister 112, 201 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, AR, 72035, USA., Goodman MH; US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 141 Experiment Station Road, PO Box 225, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Nutrition journal [Nutr J] 2020 Aug 26; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 91. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 26.
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-020-00610-3
Abstrakt: Background: Children's food preference and intake patterns are affected by parental child feeding practices. The objective was to determine patterns of food parenting practices regarding junk food and sugary drinks (JS) and investigate their associations with demographic characteristics and dietary intake in a large cohort of parents and their children (12-17 years).
Methods: Dyadic survey data from the cross-sectional, internet-based Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating Study, conducted in 2014, were analyzed using latent class analysis to identify patterns of use for six JS parenting practices - negative emotions, restriction, monitoring, availability, modeling, and child involvement - based on parent and child report. Model covariates included self-reported parent and child sex, age (child only), body mass index category (based on height and weight), added sugars intake, and legitimacy of parental authority.
Results: Based on 1657 parent-child dyads, five parenting practice patterns were identified representing different levels of practice use - Complete Influencers (28%; reference class), Indifferent Influencers (21%), Negative Influencers (20%), Minimal Influencers (18%), and Disagreeing Influencers (13%). Compared to older child dyads, younger child dyads were less likely to belong to Indifferent and Minimal Influencers (79 and 63% lower odds, respectively). Greater parent added sugars intake increased the odds of belonging to Indifferent and Negative Influencers (4 and 5% higher for every teaspoon increase, respectively) while greater child added sugars intake decreased the odds of belonging to Minimal Influencers (6% lower for every teaspoon increase). Compared to dyads with high scores, dyads with low child scores for legitimacy of parental authority regarding JS were 18 times as likely to belong to Disagreeing Influencers.
Conclusions: The study findings suggest that parents utilize distinct patterns of feeding practices regarding JS ranging from use of many practices, use of some practices, to low use of any practice, with differential associations with parent and child intakes of added sugars. Counseling or intervening with parents to use a mix of structure practices, such as availability and modeling, to positively influence their child's and possibly their own intake of sugary snacks and drinks may prove more efficacious than use of coercive control practices, such as negative emotions.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje