Validation of the Italian version of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (NuPCI) and its correlations with pregnancy-specific stress.

Autor: Penengo C; Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy. chiara.penengo@gmail.com., Colli C; Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy., Garzitto M; Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy., Driul L; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy., Cesco M; Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy., Balestrieri M; Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC pregnancy and childbirth [BMC Pregnancy Childbirth] 2020 Aug 14; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 466. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 14.
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03159-5
Abstrakt: Background: Pregnancy is a period of happiness but also of physical and psychological changes that can lead to distress. Functional coping strategies can reduce the pregnancy specific-stress. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (NuPCI) in an Italian sample and to investigate how coping strategies were associated with pregnancy-specific stress.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, low-risk pregnant women (N = 211) were assessed with NuPCI, NuPDQ (Revised-Prenatal Distress Questionnaire), Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to the Problems Experienced), and STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). The reliability of NuPCI was evaluated by assessing its internal consistency and factor structure (with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA). The concurrent validity between NuPCI and Brief-COPE and NuPDQ and STAI was investigated. Lastly, the relationship between NuPCI and NuPDQ was analyzed, as well as the ability of these scales to predict Apgar score at birth.
Results: Internal consistency of NuPCI scales was good for Planning-Preparation (ɑ C =0.84) and Spiritual-Positive Coping (ɑ C =0.81) scales, acceptable for Avoidance (ɑ C =0.76) scale. Moreover, the original three-factor structure was confirmed using a CFA with 29 of the 32 items (χ 2 374  = 618.06; RMSEA = 0.056, 95% confidence interval: [0.048, 0.063]); CFI = 0.920; and TLI = 0.913). Statistically significant correlations between NuPCI scales and Brief-COPE subscales ranged between r = + 0.217 and r = + 0.624; also, NuPDQ score was positively correlated with STAI scales (State scale: r = + 0.539; Trait scale: r = + 0.462). Concurrent validity was confirmed reporting that NuPDQ score was predicted by NuPCI scores (R 2  = 0.423, p < 0.001), positively by Avoidance (β=+0.572) and Planning-Preparation (β=+0.215) and negatively by Spiritual-Positive Coping (β=-0.132). Finally, considering the stress, the effect of the Avoidance and Spiritual-Positive Coping scores respectively in decreasing (+ 155%) and increasing (+ 16%) the Apgar score became stronger.
Conclusions: Italian NuPCI has sound psychometric properties and it is a useful coping measure. NuPDQ showed also a good validity. Our results may suggest a significant role for coping strategies, particularly in modulating the condition of the newborn at birth.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje