| Autor: |
Burdett ERR; University of Nottingham, School of Psychology, NottinghamNG7 2RD, UKEmily.burdett@nottingham.ac.ukhttps://www.nottingham.ac.uk/psychology/people/emily.burdett., Ronfard S; University of Toronto, Psychology UTMCCT4059, Mississauga, OntarioL5L1C6, Canada.samuel.ronfard@utoronto.cahttps://www.utm.utoronto.ca/psychology/faculty-staff/ronfard-samuel. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
The Behavioral and brain sciences [Behav Brain Sci] 2020 Aug 10; Vol. 43, pp. e159. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 10. |
| DOI: |
10.1017/S0140525X20000175 |
| Abstrakt: |
Osiurak and Reynaud argue that children are not a good methodological choice to examine cumulative technological culture (CTC). However, the paper ignores other current work that suggests that young children do display some aspects of creative problem-solving. We argue that using multiple methodologies and examining how technical-reasoning develops in children will provide crucial support for a cognitive approach to CTC. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
