Enhanced Recovery After Pancreatic Surgery Does One Size Really Fit All? A Clinical Score to Predict the Failure of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Autor: Capretti G; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy., Cereda M; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. m.cereda6@campus.unimib.it.; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy. m.cereda6@campus.unimib.it., Gavazzi F; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy., Uccelli F; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy., Ridolfi C; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy., Nappo G; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy., Donisi G; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy., Evangelista A; Department of Economy and Statistic, University of Torino, Torino, Italy., Zerbi A; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: World journal of surgery [World J Surg] 2020 Nov; Vol. 44 (11), pp. 3600-3606. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 30.
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05693-x
Abstrakt: Background: The inability to comply with enhanced recovery protocols (ERp) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a real but understated issue. Our goal is to report our experience and a potential tool to predict ERp failure in order to better characterize this problem.
Methods: From January 1, 2014, to January 31, 2016, 205 consecutive patients underwent PD in our center and were managed according to an ERp. Failure to comply with postoperative protocol items was defined as any of: no active ambulation on postoperative day 1 (POD1); less than 4 h out of bed on POD2; removal of nasogastric tube and bladder catheter after POD1 and POD3, respectively; reintroduction of oral feeding after POD4; and continuation of intravenous infusions after POD4. Data were collected in a prospective database.
Results: Taking in consideration the number of failed items and the length of stay, we defined failure of the ERp as no compliance to two or more items. A total of 116 patients (56.6%) met this definition of failure. We created a predictive model consisting of age, BMI, operative time, and pancreatic stump consistency. These variables were independent predictors of failure (OR 1.03 [1.001-1.06] p = 0.01; OR 1.11 [1.01-1.22] p = 0.03; OR 1.004 [1.001-1.009] p = 0.02 and OR 2.89 [1.48-5.67] p = 0.002, respectively). Patient final score predicted the failure of the ERp with an area under the ROC curve of 0.747.
Conclusions: It seems to be possible to predict ERp failure after PD. Patients at high risk of failure may benefit more from a specific ERp.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: