Postoperative Urinary Retention Rates after Autofill versus Backfill Void Trial following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Autor:	Farag S; Division of Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida (all authors).. Electronic address: faragsara@gmail.com., Padilla PF; Division of Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida (all authors)., Smith KA; Division of Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida (all authors)., Zimberg SE; Division of Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida (all authors)., Sprague ML; Division of Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida (all authors).
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of minimally invasive gynecology [J Minim Invasive Gynecol] 2021 Apr; Vol. 28 (4), pp. 829-837. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 24.
DOI:	10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.013
Abstrakt:	Study Objective: To compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the autofill vs the backfill void trial. Secondary objectives were to compare the time to discharge from the recovery room, rate of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), perceived bladder condition, the effect of bladder function on life, and patient satisfaction. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Single academic medical center. Patients: Women who underwent TLH by conventional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted laparoscopy for benign non-urogynecologic indications. Interventions: After TLH, participants were randomized to have an autofill void trial (group A) or a backfill void trial once they were able to ambulate (group B). Failure rate, time to discharge, and UTI rate were assessed. Participants completed the patient perception of bladder condition and the incontinence impact questionnaire-short form questionnaires. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of POUR. Measurements and Main Results: Eighty-two participants completed the study after randomization, 42 in group A and 40 in group B. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic or perioperative outcomes. Seven participants had POUR in group A (16.7%) and 11 in group B (27.5%) (p = .36), respectively. The median time to discharge was 176 minutes for group A (160.5, 255.5) and 218 minutes for group B (180, 265) (p = .01), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in rate of postoperative UTI (p >.99), patient perception of bladder condition scores (p = .24), incontinence impact questionnaire-short form scores (p = .23), and patient satisfaction scores (p = .26). A stepwise logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate any predictors of POUR. Conclusion: Backfill void trial once the participant was able to ambulate was not superior to the autofill void trial with respect to the rate of POUR. The autofill void trial resulted in faster same-day discharge. (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu