General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.

Autor: Damarell RA; Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001. raechel.damarell@flinders.edu.au., Morgan DD; Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001., Tieman JJ; Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC family practice [BMC Fam Pract] 2020 Jul 01; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 131. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 01.
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01197-8
Abstrakt: Background: General practitioners (GPs) increasingly manage patients with multimorbidity but report challenges in doing so. Patients describe poor experiences with health care systems that treat each of their health conditions separately, resulting in fragmented, uncoordinated care. For GPs to provide the patient-centred, coordinated care patients need and want, research agendas and health system structures and policies will need to adapt to address this epidemiologic transition. This systematic review seeks to understand if and how multimorbidity impacts on the work of GPs, the strategies they employ to manage challenges, and what they believe still needs addressing to ensure quality patient care.
Methods: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies reporting GP experiences of managing patients with multimorbidity. The search included nine major databases, grey literature sources, Google and Google Scholar, a hand search of Journal of Comorbidity, and the reference lists of included studies.
Results: Thirty-three studies from fourteen countries were included. Three major challenges were identified: practising without supportive evidence; working within a fragmented health care system whose policies and structures remain organised around single condition care and specialisation; and the clinical uncertainty associated with multimorbidity complexity and general practitioner perceptions of decisional risk. GPs revealed three approaches to mitigating these challenges: prioritising patient-centredness and relational continuity; relying on knowledge of patient preferences and unique circumstances to individualise care; and structuring the consultation to create a sense of time and minimise patient risk.
Conclusions: GPs described an ongoing tension between applying single condition guidelines to patients with multimorbidity as security against uncertainty or penalty, and potentially causing patients harm. Above all, they chose to prioritise their long-term relationships for the numerous gains this brought such as mutual trust, deeper insight into a patient's unique circumstances, and useable knowledge of each individual's capacity for the work of illness and goals for life. GPs described a need for better multimorbidity management guidance. Perhaps more than this, they require policies and models of practice that provide remunerated time and space for nurturing trustful therapeutic partnerships.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje