A case study evaluation of a community multidisciplinary team in South East England using a mixed-method approach.
| Autor: | Muscat JW; South Kent Coast CC. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners [Br J Gen Pract] 2020 Jun; Vol. 70 (suppl 1). |
| DOI: | 10.3399/bjgp20X711569 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Community multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) represent a model of integrated care comprising health, social care, and the voluntary sector where members work collaboratively to coordinate care for those patients most at risk. Aim: The evaluation will answer the question, 'What are the enablers and what are the restrictors to the embedding of the case study MDT into the routine practice of the health and social care teams involved in the project?' Method: The MDT was evaluated using a mixed-method approach with normalisation process theory as a methodological tool. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through a questionnaire consisting of the NoMAD survey followed by free-form questions. Results: The concepts of the MDT were generally clear, and participants could see the potential benefits of the programme, though this was found to be lower in GPs. Certain professionals, particularly mental health and nursing professionals, found it difficult to integrate the MDT into normal working patterns because of a lack of resources. Participants also felt there was a lack of training for MDT working. A lack of awareness of evidence supporting the programme was shown particularly within management, GP, and nursing roles. Conclusion: Specific recommendations have been made in order to improve the MDT under evaluation. These include adjustments to IT systems and meeting documentation, continued education as to the purpose of the MDT, and the engagement of GPs to enable better buy-in. Recommendations were made to focus the agenda with specialist attendance when necessary, and to expand the MDT remit, particularly in mental health and geriatrics. (© British Journal of General Practice 2020.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|