Triggered Imaging With Auto Beam Hold and Pre-/Posttreatment CBCT During Prostate SABR: Analysis of Time Efficiency, Target Coverage, and Normal Volume Changes.

Autor:	Kisivan K; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary., Antal G; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary., Gulyban A; Medical Physics Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgium., Glavak C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary., Laszlo Z; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary., Kalincsak J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary., Gugyeras D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary., Jenei T; Department of Urology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Kaposvar, Hungary., Csima M; Faculty of Pedagogy, Kaposvar University, Kaposvar, Hungary., Lakosi F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Somogy County Mor Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Dr Jozsef Baka Center, Kaposvar, Hungary. Electronic address: lakosiferenc@yahoo.com.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Practical radiation oncology [Pract Radiat Oncol] 2021 Mar-Apr; Vol. 11 (2), pp. e210-e218. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 23.
DOI:	10.1016/j.prro.2020.04.014
Abstrakt:	Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate time efficiency and target coverage for prostate stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) using triggered imaging (TI) and auto beam hold. Methods and Materials: A total of 20 patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc-based SABR. Treatment verification consisted of pre- and post-radiation therapy cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with gold marker-based TI every 3 seconds. In case of ≥3 mm (deviation limit) displacement, the treatment was interrupted and imaging-based correction was performed. Beam interruptions, intrafractional shifts, and treatment times were recorded. Prostate, rectum, and bladder were delineated on each CBCT. Target coverage was evaluated by comparing the individual prostate delineations with 98% isodose contour volumes (% of the evaluated volumes exceeding the reference). Both inter- and intrafractional changes of bladder and rectal volumes were assessed. Results: The average overall treatment time (±standard deviation) was 18 ± 11 min, with a radiation delivery time of 6 ± 3 min if no intrafractional CBCT acquisitions were necessary (91% of fractions). On average, 1.2 beam interruptions per fraction were required with 0/1 correction in 71% of the fractions. The mean residual 3-dimensional shift was 1.6 mm, exceeding the deviation limit in 8%. In the case of intrafractional CBCT and/or ≥2 corrections the treatment time dramatically increased. The 98% isodose lines did not encompass the prostate in only 8/180 (4%) evaluations in 6 different patients, leading to a loss of D98 between 0.1%-6% as a worst case scenario. The bladder volumes showed significant increases during treatment (P < .01) while rectal volumes were stable. Conclusions: Time efficiency of TI + auto beam hold with 3 mm/3 sec threshold during prostate SABR is comparable with competitive techniques, resulting in minimal 3-dimensional residual errors with maintained target coverage. Technical developments are necessary to further reduce radiation delivery time. Use of CBCT allowed full control of rectal volumes, while bladder volumes showed significant increases over time. (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu