Case Comment: Re D (A Child) [2019] UKSC 42.
Autor: | Keene AR; 39 Essex Chambers, London, UK; King's College London, London, UK., Xu X; The School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Medical law review [Med Law Rev] 2020 Aug 01; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 595-604. |
DOI: | 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa007 |
Abstrakt: | How (if at all) can the right to liberty of a child under Article 5 European Convention on Human Rights ('ECHR') be balanced against the rights of parents, enshrined both at common law and under Article 8 ECHR? Is there a limit to the extent to which parents can themselves, or via others, seek to impose restrictions upon their disabled child's liberty so as to secure their child's interests? This case considers the answers to these questions given by and the implications of the decision of the Supreme Court in September 2019 in Re D (A Child) [2019] UKSC 42. (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press; All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |