| Autor: |
Glassford E; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA., Neu-Baker NM; Nanobioscience Constellation, College of Nanoscale Science & Engineering, State University of New York (SUNY) Polytechnic Institute, USA., Dunn KL; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA., Dunn KH; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, USA. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Industrial health [Ind Health] 2020 Oct 08; Vol. 58 (5), pp. 467-478. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 22. |
| DOI: |
10.2486/indhealth.2019-0169 |
| Abstrakt: |
From 2011-2015, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Nanotechnology Field Studies Team conducted 11 evaluations at worksites that either produced engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) via a wet process or used ENMs in a wetted, suspended, or slurry form. Wet handling or processing of ENMs reduces potential exposure compared to dry handling or processing; however, air sampling data indicated exposures may still occur. Information was gathered about each company, production processes, ENMs of interest, and control measures. Exposure assessments included air sampling using filter media, surface wipe sampling, and real-time particle counting by direct-reading instruments. Electron microscopy analysis of air filters confirmed the presence of ENMs of interest (10 of 11 sites). When a method was available, chemical analysis of filters was also used to detect the presence of ENMs (nine of 11 sites). Wipe samples were collected at four of the 11 sites, and, in each case, confirmed the presence of ENMs on surfaces. Direct-reading data showed potential nanomaterial emissions (nine of 11 sites). Engineering controls included fume hoods, cleanrooms, and enclosed processes. Personal protective equipment was required during all 11 evaluations. Recommendations to address potential exposures were provided to each company following the hierarchy of controls. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
