| Autor: |
Pourghadiri A; BC Professional Firefighters' Burn and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., Alnojeidi H; BC Professional Firefighters' Burn and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., Jalili R; BC Professional Firefighters' Burn and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., Kilani RT; BC Professional Firefighters' Burn and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., Nabai L; BC Professional Firefighters' Burn and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., Ghahary A; BC Professional Firefighters' Burn and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. |
| Abstrakt: |
Objective: Full-thickness burn wounds require immediate coverage, and the primary clinical approaches comprise of skin allografts and autografts. The use of allografts is often temporary due to the antigenicity of allografts. In contrast, the availability of skin autografts may be limited in large burn injuries. In such cases, skin autografts can be expanded through the use of a skin mesher, creating meshed split-thickness skin grafts (MSTSGs). MSTSGs have revolutionized the treatment of large full-thickness burn injuries since the 1960s. However, contractures and poor esthetic outcomes remain a problem. We previously formulated and prepared an in situ forming skin substitute, called MeshFill (MF), which can conform to complex shapes and contours of wounds. The objective of this study was to assess the esthetic and wound healing outcomes in full-thickness wounds treated with a combination of MF and MSTSG in a porcine model. Approach: Either MSTSGs or MSTSG+MF was applied to full-thickness excisional wounds in Yorkshire pigs. Wound healing outcomes were assessed using histology, immunohistochemistry, and wound surface area analysis from day 10 to 60. Clinical evaluation of wounds were utilized to assess esthetic outcomes. Results: The results demonstrated that the combination of MSTSGs and MF improved wound healing and esthetic outcomes. Innovation: Effects of MSTSGs and reconstitutable liquid MF in a full-thickness porcine model were investigated for the first time. Conclusion: MF provides promise as a combination therapeutic regimen to improve wound healing and esthetic outcomes. |
