| Autor: |
Morgan TL; The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA., Young BP; The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA., Lipak KG; The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA., Lehmann V; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Klosky J; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA., Quinn GP; New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA., Gerhardt CA; The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA., Nahata L; The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.; Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, which is known to cause psychological distress. Yet, less than 50% of at-risk adolescent and young adult (AYA) males pursue fertility preservation (FP) at diagnosis. Alternatives to biological parenthood (e.g., adoption/sperm donation) may be considered, but little is known about perspectives regarding these alternatives among AYA males and their families. Methods: Families of AYAs were recruited for a mixed-method study examining FP decisions at cancer diagnosis. One month later, 48 participants from 20 families (18 male AYAs, 12-22 years of age, 19 mothers, 11 fathers) completed semistructured interviews, including two questions about: (a) alternative routes to biological parenthood, and (b) their knowledge about the processes involved and/or challenges associated with such alternatives. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. Results: Three main themes were identified, of which two represent both ends of considering alternative parenthood: (a) Willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood, primarily adoption; (b) No consideration/discussion of alternative family building options; and (c) Variable knowledge of alternatives and/or associated challenges. Notably, more AYAs than parents mentioned a specific preference for biological children. Conclusions: One-month postcancer diagnosis, most parents reported willingness to consider alternatives to biological parenthood for their sons, while AYA males were less knowledgeable or open to these options. Future research should prospectively examine how these attitudes affect FP decisions before treatment. Medical and psychosocial providers should counsel patients and survivors accordingly to optimize reproductive outcomes and prevent psychosocial distress if parenthood goals are unfulfilled. |
