[Design and validation of the second edition of the Women's Sexual Function Questionnaire, FSM-2].

Autor:	Sánchez-Sánchez F; Centro de Salud de Xàtiva, Xàtiva (Valencia), España. Electronic address: consultafsanchez@gmail.com., Ferrer-Casanova C; Centro de Salud de Xàtiva, Xàtiva (Valencia), España., Ponce-Buj B; Centro de Salud de Xàtiva, Xàtiva (Valencia), España., Sipán-Sarrión Y; Centro de Salud de Xàtiva, Xàtiva (Valencia), España., Jurado-López AR; Instituto Europeo de Sexología , Marbella (Málaga), España., San Martin-Blanco C; Centro Interdisciplinar de Psicología y Salud (CIPSA). Santander, España., Tijeras-Úbeda MJ; Unidad de Gestión Clínica, Almería periferia, Almería, España., Ferrández Infante A; Centro de Salud Guadarrama, Guadarrama (Madrid). España.
Jazyk:	Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj:	Semergen [Semergen] 2020 Jul - Aug; Vol. 46 (5), pp. 324-330. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 18.
DOI:	10.1016/j.semerg.2020.01.004
Abstrakt:	Objective: To design and validate the second edition of the Female Sexual Function questionnaire (FSF-2). Material and Methods: A cross-sectional and multicentre study was conducted on 187 women (18-70 years) who completed a test (preliminary questionnaire FSF-2), and then answered a structured anamnesis on female sexual function. Four weeks later they completed a retest, which was equal to the test but with an additional question about possible influence of recent events in their sex life. Results: The mean age of the women was 43.51 years. Internal consistency of the questionnaire: Cronbach's α of the 0.919 test, of structured anamnesis 0.921, of the 0.920 retest. Test-retest reliability: mean test scores 30.53 ± 8.605, retest 30.05 ± 8.770, without significant differences. Correlation between total test and retest scores (intraclass correlation coefficient) 0.960, significant (P<.01); between total test scores and structured anamnesis 0.977, significant (P<.01). Concordance between test questions and structured anamnesis (kappa index), minimum 0.706, maximum 0.915; between test and retest questions, minimum 0.630, maximum 0.802. Content validity by expert consensus. Criteria validity: specificity of the questionnaire exceeding 90% for all items/domains, sensitivity greater than 80%, except for items 5, 6, 9 (70-80%). Validity of the construct through factor analysis, grouping of items into 2 components (they explain 66.586% of variance). Conclusions: The FSF-2 questionnaire is reliable and valid. It evaluates the sexual response of women, describing important aspects of their sexual activity as a couple: anticipatory anxiety, initiative, confidence to communicate, preferences and events that may influence. It can detect sexual dysfunction in the couple. (Copyright © 2020 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu