Ecological Momentary Assessment in Patients With an Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Study on Compliance and Fluctuations.

Autor:	Forster SD; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany., Gauggel S; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany., Petershofer A; VAMED Klinik Hattingen GmbH, Rehabilitation Centre for Neurology, Neurosurgery, Neuropaediatrics, Hattingen, Germany., Völzke V; VAMED Klinik Hattingen GmbH, Rehabilitation Centre for Neurology, Neurosurgery, Neuropaediatrics, Hattingen, Germany., Mainz V; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Frontiers in neurology [Front Neurol] 2020 Mar 05; Vol. 11, pp. 115. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 05 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI:	10.3389/fneur.2020.00115
Abstrakt:	Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) promises to be a suitable method for capturing the dynamics in self-assessments through repeated measurements in naturalistic environments using common mobile devices. Therefore, EMA could increase the power of neuropsychological assessment by obtaining a more fine-grained picture of symptoms, limitations, and strengths in patients with an acquired brain injury (ABI) in real-life situations. The present study examined 15 patients with an ABI with cognitive and motor impairments. Following a semirandomized high-frequency sampling plan to assess EMA's feasibility and applicability, data were collected across 7 days. At eight prompts per day, patients were asked about their current activities, the social context they were in, their current mood, performance judgments of their own functional status, and the frequency of self-reflections. The average compliance rate was 71.6%. The fluctuations in patients' responses were measured in terms of variance distributions within simple (intercept only) three-level models and root mean square of successive difference values. They were sufficient, as shown, for example, by the mean within-person variability of 44.9% across all of the items studied. There were no significant correlations between patients' age, severity of depressive symptoms, or their level of functioning and their compliance with study participation or the variability of their responses. The results support the feasibility and applicability of EMA as an assessment technique in patients with an ABI. There are, however, limitations that should be considered when planning an assessment of brain-injured patients using EMA. (Copyright © 2020 Forster, Gauggel, Petershofer, Völzke and Mainz.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu