Cytocompatibility and cell proliferation evaluation of calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers.

Autor:	Mestieri LB; Departament of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil., Zaccara IM; Departament of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil., Pinheiro LS; Departament of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil., Barletta FB; School of Dentistry, Lutheran University of Brazil - ULBRA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil., Kopper PMP; Departament of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil., Grecca FS; Departament of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Restorative dentistry & endodontics [Restor Dent Endod] 2019 Nov 15; Vol. 45 (1), pp. e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 15 (Print Publication: 2020).
DOI:	10.5395/rde.2020.45.e2
Abstrakt:	Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cell viability and migration of Endosequence Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer (BC Sealer) compared to MTA Fillapex and AH Plus. Materials and Methods: BC Sealer, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus were placed in contact with culture medium to obtain sealers extracts in dilution 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4. 3T3 cells were plated and exposed to the extracts. Cell viability and migration were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazoyl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Scratch assay, respectively. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test ( p < 0.05). Results: The MTT assay revealed greater cytotoxicity for AH Plus and MTA Fillapex at 1:1 dilution when compared to control ( p < 0.05). At 1:2 and 1:4 dilutions, all sealers were similar to control ( p > 0.05) and MTA Fillapex was more cytotoxic than BC Sealer ( p < 0.05). Scratch assay demonstrated the continuous closure of the wound according to time. At 30 hours, the control group presented closure of the wound ( p < 0.05). At 36 hours, only BC Sealer presented the closure when compared to AH Plus and MTA Fillapex ( p < 0.05). At 42 hours, AH Plus and MTA Fillapex showed a wound healing ( p > 0.05). Conclusions: All tested sealers demonstrated cell viability highlighting BC Sealer, which showed increased cell migration capacity suggesting that this sealer may achieve better tissue repair when compared to other tested sealers. Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. (Copyright © 2020. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu