Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases.
Autor: | Yalçın S; Department of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey., Yılmaz S; Department of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey., Gazel E; Clinic of Urology, Acıbadem Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey., Kaya E; Department of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey., Aydoğan TB; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy., Aybal HÇ; Clinic of Urology, Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey., Tunç L; Department of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Turkish journal of urology [Turk J Urol] 2020 Jan 17; Vol. 46 (3), pp. 219-225. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 17 (Print Publication: 2020). |
DOI: | 10.5152/tud.2020.19235 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis on 600 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2015 and April 2019 was performed. Perioperative measures including enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), and percentage of resected tissue weight (PRW) were recorded. Hospitalization time (HT) and catheterization time (CT) were measured. Functional outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Results: The mean age, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen levels of the patients were 64.54 years, 91 g, and 4.54 ng/mL, respectively. There were 38.3% of patients with ≥100 g prostate size. The measured EE, ME, and PRW were 1.12 g/min, 4 g/min, and 72%, respectively. The mean HT and CT were 24.53 h and 21.50 h, respectively. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable with the literature. The most common perioperative complication was superficial bladder mucosal injury (n=8, 1.33%). Only one patient had persistent stress urinary incontinence at 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: As mentioned in the literature, HoLEP indications are independent from prostate size. Our results showed similarity with the literature on functional outcomes, complication rates, and continence status. With its superior results, our HoLEP series from Turkey supports that HoLEP will replace transurethral resection of the prostate as the known current gold standard. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |