Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile.

Autor: Tagle M; Centro Mario Molina Chile, Antonio Bellet 292, Providencia, Santiago, Chile., Rojas F; Centro Mario Molina Chile, Antonio Bellet 292, Providencia, Santiago, Chile., Reyes F; Centro Mario Molina Chile, Antonio Bellet 292, Providencia, Santiago, Chile., Vásquez Y; Centro Mario Molina Chile, Antonio Bellet 292, Providencia, Santiago, Chile., Hallgren F; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Aschebergsgatan 44, Gothenburg, Sweden., Lindén J; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Aschebergsgatan 44, Gothenburg, Sweden., Kolev D; RISE Acreo, Research Institutes of Sweden, Lindholmspiren 7 A, Gothenburg, Sweden., Watne ÅK; Environment Administration, City of Gothenburg, Karl Johansgatan 23, Gothenburg, Sweden., Oyola P; Centro Mario Molina Chile, Antonio Bellet 292, Providencia, Santiago, Chile. poyola@cmmolina.cl.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Environmental monitoring and assessment [Environ Monit Assess] 2020 Feb 10; Vol. 192 (3), pp. 171. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 10.
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
Abstrakt: Integration of low-cost air quality sensors with the internet of things (IoT) has become a feasible approach towards the development of smart cities. Several studies have assessed the performance of low-cost air quality sensors by comparing their measurements with reference instruments. We examined the performance of a low-cost IoT particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) sensor in the urban environment of Santiago, Chile. The prototype was assembled from a PM 10 -PM 2.5 sensor (SDS011), a temperature and relative humidity sensor (BME280) and an IoT board (ESP8266/Node MCU). Field tests were conducted at three regulatory monitoring stations during the 2018 austral winter and spring seasons. The sensors at each site were operated in parallel with continuous reference air quality monitors (BAM 1020 and TEOM 1400) and a filter-based sampler (Partisol 2000i). Variability between sensor units (n = 7) and the correlation between the sensor and reference instruments were examined. Moderate inter-unit variability was observed between sensors for PM 2.5 (normalized root-mean-square error 9-24%) and PM 10 (10-37%). The correlations between the 1-h average concentrations reported by the sensors and continuous monitors were higher for PM 2.5 (R 2 0.47-0.86) than PM 10 (0.24-0.56). The correlations (R 2 ) between the 24-h PM 2.5 averages from the sensors and reference instruments were 0.63-0.87 for continuous monitoring and 0.69-0.93 for filter-based samplers. Correlation analysis revealed that sensors tended to overestimate PM concentrations in high relative humidity (RH > 75%) and underestimate when RH was below 50%. Overall, the prototype evaluated exhibited adequate performance and may be potentially suitable for monitoring daily PM 2.5 averages after correcting for RH.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: