Postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on bupivacaine subarachnoid block for open reduction and internal fixation of femoral fractures.
Autor: | Nwachukwu C; Department of Anaesthesiology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria., Idehen HO; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria., Edomwonyi NP; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria., Umeh B; Department of Anaesthesiology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Nigerian journal of clinical practice [Niger J Clin Pract] 2020 Feb; Vol. 23 (2), pp. 172-178. |
DOI: | 10.4103/njcp.njcp_142_19 |
Abstrakt: | Background: One of the drawbacks of subarachnoid block is the short duration of analgesia particularly when adjuvants are not added to local anesthetics agent used. However, dexmedetomidine an α Aims: This study seeks to determine the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal 7.5 μg of dexmedetomidine and its side effects when used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of femoral fractures. Methodology: It is a prospective randomized, double-blinded study that was carried out in a Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi in Nigeria. Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II patients were randomized into two groups of 35 each to receive 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with either 7.5 μg of dexmedetomidine in 0.3 ml of normal saline (Group D) or 0.3 ml of normal saline alone (Group S). Patient's outcome measures noted (time to first request of analgesia, proportion of patients with pain score <4 postoperatively using numerical rating scale [NRS], and total analgesic consumed in 24 h.). Results: The patients in Group D had a longer time to first request of analgesia, larger proportion of patients with pain score <4 using NRS in the 2 nd h postoperatively and lower amount of total analgesic consumed compared to those in Group S. These differences between the two groups were all statistically significant. Furthermore, there was no difference in the incidences of side effects between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the patient satisfaction was better in Group D. Conclusion: The addition of 7.5 μg of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for subarachnoid block in the management of femoral fractures using ORIF provided better anesthetic profile, particularly prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia without significant side effects. Competing Interests: None |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |