Intravaginal pressure profile of continent and incontinent women.

Autor: Cacciari LP; Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal and Research Center of the Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: licia.cacciari@usp.br., Amorim AC; Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Pássaro AC; Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Dumoulin C; School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal and Research Center of the Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada., Sacco ICN; Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of biomechanics [J Biomech] 2020 Jan 23; Vol. 99, pp. 109572. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 16.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109572
Abstrakt: A well-functioning pelvic floor muscle plays an important role in maintaining urinary continence. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the intravaginal pressure profile using a multisensor device along the vaginal length in women with and without urinary incontinence (UI), while performing pelvic floor muscle tasks. Fifty-four adult pre-menopausal women (31 continent and 23 incontinent) participated in this cross-sectional observational cohort study. The intravaginal pressure profile was assessed at rest, during maximum and sustained pelvic floor muscle contractions, using the Pliance® multisensor device. Between-group comparisons were performed considering the overall pressure and the pressure profile of 10-subregions along the vaginal length. In the overall pressure assessment, women with UI presented lower pressures at rest, similar pressures during maximum contraction and lower capacity to maintain pressure during sustained contraction compared to those in the continent group. The pressure profile assessment showed between-group differences that were consistent throughout tasks, with the incontinent group presenting lower pressures than the continent group, specifically in the mid-vaginal length, around 3-4 cm from the vaginal opening. We observed consistent deficits in pressure generation in incontinent compared to continent women, precisely in the region of the pelvic floor muscles. With this protocol and novel instrument, we obtained a reliable and consistent intravaginal pressure profile of continent and incontinent women. This approach could assist clinicians in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle function and foster a better understanding of the urinary incontinence mechanism.
(Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE