| Autor: |
Häkkinen U; Centre for Health and Social Economics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland., Goude F; Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden., Hagen TP; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway., Kruse M; Business and Economics, COHERE, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark., Moger T; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway., Peltola M; Centre for Health and Social Economics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland., Rehnberg C; Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. |
| Abstrakt: |
Aims: This article describes and discusses the extension of performance measurement using an episode-based approach so that the measurement includes primary care, and social and long-term-care services. By using data on incident stroke patients from the capital areas of four Nordic countries, this pilot study: (a) extended the disease-based performance analysis to include new indicators that better describe patient care pathways at different levels of care; (b) described and compared the performance of care given in the four areas; (c) evaluated how additional information changed the rankings of performance between the areas; and (d) described the trends in performance in the capital areas. Methods: The construction of data was based on a common protocol that used routinely collected national registers and statistics linked with local municipal registers. We created new variables describing the timing of discharge to home and institutionalisation, as well as describing the use and cost of primary and social hospital services. Risk adjustment was performed with four different sets of confounders. Results: Differences existed in various performance indicators between the four metropolitan areas. The ranking was sensitive to the risk-adjustment method. The study showed that for stroke patients a performance comparison with data that are only from secondary and tertiary care, and without a valid severity measure, is not sufficient for international comparisons. Conclusions: Extending and deepening international performance analysis in order to cover patient pathways, including primary care and social services, is very useful for benchmarking activities when focusing on diseases affecting older people. |
