| Autor: |
Welsh MK; Division of Environmental Science, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 406B Bray Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. mkwelsh@syr.edu., Vidon PG; Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 320 Bray Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA., McMillan SK; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, LILY 2-109, 225 South University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Environmental monitoring and assessment [Environ Monit Assess] 2020 Jan 03; Vol. 192 (2), pp. 85. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 03. |
| DOI: |
10.1007/s10661-019-7795-3 |
| Abstrakt: |
While the influence of stream restoration on vertical and lateral hyporheic exchange has been documented, impacts on broader riparian zone hydrology have not been thoroughly investigated. We quantified riparian water table dynamics, hydraulic gradient, and groundwater flow paths and fluxes across a range of hydrologic conditions following natural channel design restoration (riparian regrading, in-channel cross-vane structure installation). Water table measurements were collected at least once per season for 2.5 years to capture water levels during baseflow conditions from networks of wells and piezometers at sites with different stream morphology (created riffle-cross-vane-scour pool complexes versus natural pools and riffles), restoration status (agricultural restored, unrestored, forested reference), and riparian characteristics (slope, soils, topography) in North Carolina, USA. The regraded riparian zone had higher near-stream water tables (< 0.5 m below ground surface) than the unrestored site. Riffle-cross-vane complexes induced a zone of low hydraulic gradient that spanned 30-40% of the riparian area, similar to groundwater dynamics near beaver dams. This effect persisted regardless of hydrologic condition (wet or dry) or scour pool status (functioning or filled-in). Riffles also promoted a lower near-stream hydraulic gradient at the forested site. Conversely, the influence of stream features on riparian groundwater was minimal at the unrestored site, where groundwater fluxes were controlled by hillslope inputs and riparian geomorphology. Overall, restoration enhanced stream-riparian zone hydrologic interaction beyond the immediate hyporheic zone. Our work stresses that cross-vanes, even when partially buried by sediments post-restoration, impact whole floodplain hydrology in a more significant way than shown by prior stream restoration studies. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink