Comparison of two routes in nasal passage for transnasale flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy.
Autor: | Cengiz C; Ear Nose and Throat Department, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey. cyhncngz@gmail.com., Şahin E; Ear Nose and Throat Department, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey., Dağıstan H; Ear Nose and Throat Department, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey., Can İH; Ear Nose and Throat Department, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery [Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol] 2020 Mar; Vol. 277 (3), pp. 785-789. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 06. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00405-019-05753-6 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: Present study compares two routes in nasal passage for transnasal flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TNFFL). Methods: Included in the study were 60 patients who were split equally into Group 1 and Group 2 and all underwent TNFFL. The tip of endoscope was introduced between the septum and inferior turbinate along the nasal floor in Group 1 and between the inferior turbinate and middle turbinate in Group 2. O Results: No statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of physiological effects or patient comfort. When values recorded immediately after procedure were compared with baseline values, a significant decrease was observed in O Conclusion: Decreases in O |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |