Reducing Disparities in Receipt of Genetic Counseling for Underserved Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Autor: Sutton AL; Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA., Hurtado-de-Mendoza A; Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA., Quillin J; Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA., Rubinsak L; Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA., Temkin SM; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA., Gal T; Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA., Sheppard VB; Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.; Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of women's health (2002) [J Womens Health (Larchmt)] 2020 Aug; Vol. 29 (8), pp. 1131-1135. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 27.
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7984
Abstrakt: Purpose: Genetic counseling (GC) provides critical risk prediction information to women at-risk of carrying a genetic alternation; yet racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities persist with regard to GC uptake. This study examined patterns of GC uptake after a referral in a racially diverse population. Materials and Methods: In an urban academic medical center, medical records were reviewed between January 2016 and December 2017 for women who were referred to a genetic counselor for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Study outcomes were making an appointment (yes/no) and keeping an appointment. We assessed sociodemographic factors and clinical factors. Associations between factors and the outcomes were analyzed using chi square, and logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 510 women were referred to GC and most made appointments. More than half were white (55.3%) and employed (53.1%). No significant associations were observed between sociodemographic factors and making an appointment. A total of 425 women made an appointment and 268 kept their appointment. Insurance status ( p  = 0.003), marital status ( p  = 0.000), and work status ( p  = 0.039) were associated with receiving GC. In the logistic model, being married (odds ratio [OR] 2.119 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.341-3.347] p  = 0.001) and having insurance (OR 2.203 [95% CI 1.208-4.016] p  = 0.021) increased the likelihood of receiving counseling. Conclusions: Racial disparities in GC uptake were not observed in this sample. Unmarried women may need additional support to obtain GC. Financial assistance or other options need to be discussed during navigation as a way to lessen the disparity between women with insurance and those without.
Databáze: MEDLINE