Evaluating the quality of voice assistants' responses to consumer health questions about vaccines: an exploratory comparison of Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri.
| Autor: | Alagha EC; Dahlgren Memorial Library, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA ec1094@georgetown.edu., Helbing RR; University Libraries, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | BMJ health & care informatics [BMJ Health Care Inform] 2019 Nov; Vol. 26 (1). |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100075 |
| Abstrakt: | Objective: To assess the quality and accuracy of the voice assistants (VAs), Amazon Alexa, Siri and Google Assistant, in answering consumer health questions about vaccine safety and use. Methods: Responses of each VA to 54 questions related to vaccination were scored using a rubric designed to assess the accuracy of each answer provided through audio output and the quality of the source supporting each answer. Results: Out of a total of 6 possible points, Siri averaged 5.16 points, Google Assistant averaged 5.10 points and Alexa averaged 0.98 points. Google Assistant and Siri understood voice queries accurately and provided users with links to authoritative sources about vaccination. Alexa understood fewer voice queries and did not draw answers from the same sources that were used by Google Assistant and Siri. Conclusions: Those involved in patient education should be aware of the high variability of results between VAs. Developers and health technology experts should also push for greater usability and transparency about information partnerships as the health information delivery capabilities of these devices expand in the future. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|